{
"id": "break-even-inhouse-outsourcing",
"schemaVersion": 2,
"title": {
"ja": "月600件で内製と外注が逆転 — 1件単価だけで決めない",
"en": "In-House and Outsourced Costs Cross at 600 Orders per Month"
},
"summary": {
"ja": "固定費と従量費を足した総費用を2本の直線で比べ、交点の左右で安い案が変わる損益分岐を示す。1件単価だけで外注を選ばない",
"en": "Compare total monthly cost as fixed plus per-order costs. The intersection shows where the cheaper option switches, so unit cost alone does not drive the choice."
},
"capturedAt": "2026-09-25",
"categories": [
"presentation"
],
"tags": [
"data-viz",
"minimal"
],
"useCases": [
"pricing",
"comparison"
],
"format": "slide-16x9",
"density": "medium",
"layout": {
"kind": "axis",
"canvas": {
"w": 1920,
"h": 1080
},
"margin": {
"top": 82,
"right": 120,
"bottom": 82,
"left": 120
}
},
"type": {
"title": {
"size": 44,
"weight": 700,
"tracking": "0.01em"
},
"subtitle": {
"size": 22,
"weight": 400
},
"axisTitle": {
"size": 20,
"weight": 500
},
"axisTick": {
"size": 20,
"weight": 400,
"numeric": "tabular"
},
"seriesLabel": {
"size": 22,
"weight": 700
},
"lineEnd": {
"size": 20,
"weight": 500,
"numeric": "tabular"
},
"crossingLabel": {
"size": 22,
"weight": 500
},
"crossingValue": {
"size": 30,
"weight": 700,
"numeric": "tabular"
},
"panelTitle": {
"size": 24,
"weight": 700
},
"panelValue": {
"size": 42,
"weight": 700,
"numeric": "tabular"
},
"panelCopy": {
"size": 20,
"weight": 400
},
"regionValue": {
"size": 22,
"weight": 700
},
"regionCopy": {
"size": 20,
"weight": 400
},
"assumption": {
"size": 20,
"weight": 400
},
"conclusion": {
"size": 26,
"weight": 500
}
},
"colors": {
"ground": "#FFFFFF",
"surface": "#F4F6F9",
"ink": "#131820",
"muted": "#667183",
"accent": "#1F5FA8",
"rule": "#DBE1E9",
"series": [
"#2F6FB5",
"#A85A2E"
]
},
"rules": [
{
"ja": "縦軸は固定費と従量費を合算した月間総額にする。1件単価だけを比較すると、固定費がある案の有利不利が隠れる",
"en": "Plot total monthly cost, combining fixed and per-order charges. Comparing unit rates alone hides the effect of fixed costs."
},
{
"ja": "交点が等費用になる。交点より左と右でどちらの案が低いかを、同じ尺度で示す",
"en": "The intersection is the equal-cost volume. Use the same scale to show which option costs less on either side."
},
{
"ja": "計算の前提と含めていない費用を明記する。品質差・立ち上げ・移行費用があれば交点は変わる",
"en": "State calculation assumptions and excluded costs. Quality differences, setup, or migration can move the break-even point."
},
{
"ja": "架空の単価を用いた試算であり、実際の委託判断を推奨するものではない",
"en": "This uses fictional rates and is not a recommendation for a real sourcing decision."
}
],
"cover": "https://design-vault.pages.dev/_astro/cover.DMUpyj8q.png",
"assets": [],
"shortlist": false,
"status": "published",
"relations": {
"similar": []
},
"license": "Original",
"publishedAt": null,
"reproduction": {
"spec": {
"format": "slide-16x9",
"density": "medium",
"layout": {
"kind": "axis",
"canvas": {
"w": 1920,
"h": 1080
},
"margin": {
"top": 82,
"right": 120,
"bottom": 82,
"left": 120
}
},
"type": {
"title": {
"size": 44,
"weight": 700,
"tracking": "0.01em"
},
"subtitle": {
"size": 22,
"weight": 400
},
"axisTitle": {
"size": 20,
"weight": 500
},
"axisTick": {
"size": 20,
"weight": 400,
"numeric": "tabular"
},
"seriesLabel": {
"size": 22,
"weight": 700
},
"lineEnd": {
"size": 20,
"weight": 500,
"numeric": "tabular"
},
"crossingLabel": {
"size": 22,
"weight": 500
},
"crossingValue": {
"size": 30,
"weight": 700,
"numeric": "tabular"
},
"panelTitle": {
"size": 24,
"weight": 700
},
"panelValue": {
"size": 42,
"weight": 700,
"numeric": "tabular"
},
"panelCopy": {
"size": 20,
"weight": 400
},
"regionValue": {
"size": 22,
"weight": 700
},
"regionCopy": {
"size": 20,
"weight": 400
},
"assumption": {
"size": 20,
"weight": 400
},
"conclusion": {
"size": 26,
"weight": 500
}
},
"colors": {
"ground": "#FFFFFF",
"surface": "#F4F6F9",
"ink": "#131820",
"muted": "#667183",
"accent": "#1F5FA8",
"rule": "#DBE1E9",
"series": [
"#2F6FB5",
"#A85A2E"
]
},
"rules": [
"Plot total monthly cost, combining fixed and per-order charges. Comparing unit rates alone hides the effect of fixed costs.",
"The intersection is the equal-cost volume. Use the same scale to show which option costs less on either side.",
"State calculation assumptions and excluded costs. Quality differences, setup, or migration can move the break-even point.",
"This uses fictional rates and is not a recommendation for a real sourcing decision."
]
},
"prompt": {
"ja": "以下の仕様でスライドを 1 枚作ってください。\n\n- 版面 1920 × 1080\n- 余白 上 82 右 120 下 82 左 120\n\n## 文字（版面 1920px に対する px）\ntitle 44px / 700 / 字間 0.01em\nsubtitle 22px / 400\naxisTitle 20px / 500\naxisTick 20px / 400 / 等幅数字\nseriesLabel 22px / 700\nlineEnd 20px / 500 / 等幅数字\ncrossingLabel 22px / 500\ncrossingValue 30px / 700 / 等幅数字\npanelTitle 24px / 700\npanelValue 42px / 700 / 等幅数字\npanelCopy 20px / 400\nregionValue 22px / 700\nregionCopy 20px / 400\nassumption 20px / 400\nconclusion 26px / 500\n\n## 配色\n地 #FFFFFF / 面 #F4F6F9 / 文字 #131820 / 補助 #667183 / 強調 #1F5FA8 / 罫 #DBE1E9 / #2F6FB5 / #A85A2E\n\n## 外すと崩れる点\n- 縦軸は固定費と従量費を合算した月間総額にする。1件単価だけを比較すると、固定費がある案の有利不利が隠れる\n- 交点が等費用になる。交点より左と右でどちらの案が低いかを、同じ尺度で示す\n- 計算の前提と含めていない費用を明記する。品質差・立ち上げ・移行費用があれば交点は変わる\n- 架空の単価を用いた試算であり、実際の委託判断を推奨するものではない\n\n内容は［ここに自分の内容を書く］に置き換えてください。寸法と配色はそのまま守ってください。\n正確に再現する場合は、この HTML をそのまま使ってください: https://design-vault.pages.dev/designs/break-even-inhouse-outsourcing/pattern.html",
"en": "Produce one slide to the following specification.\n\n- Canvas 1920 × 1080\n- Margin top 82 right 120 bottom 82 left 120\n\n## Type (px against a 1920px canvas)\ntitle 44px / 700 / tracking 0.01em\nsubtitle 22px / 400\naxisTitle 20px / 500\naxisTick 20px / 400 / tabular numerals\nseriesLabel 22px / 700\nlineEnd 20px / 500 / tabular numerals\ncrossingLabel 22px / 500\ncrossingValue 30px / 700 / tabular numerals\npanelTitle 24px / 700\npanelValue 42px / 700 / tabular numerals\npanelCopy 20px / 400\nregionValue 22px / 700\nregionCopy 20px / 400\nassumption 20px / 400\nconclusion 26px / 500\n\n## Colour\nGround #FFFFFF / Surface #F4F6F9 / Ink #131820 / Muted #667183 / Accent #1F5FA8 / Rule #DBE1E9 / #2F6FB5 / #A85A2E\n\n## Constraints — dropping these breaks it\n- Plot total monthly cost, combining fixed and per-order charges. Comparing unit rates alone hides the effect of fixed costs.\n- The intersection is the equal-cost volume. Use the same scale to show which option costs less on either side.\n- State calculation assumptions and excluded costs. Quality differences, setup, or migration can move the break-even point.\n- This uses fictional rates and is not a recommendation for a real sourcing decision.\n\nReplace the content with [your content]. Keep the measurements and colours as given.\nFor an exact reproduction, use the verbatim HTML at https://design-vault.pages.dev/designs/break-even-inhouse-outsourcing/pattern.html."
},
"code": {
"html": "\n\n月600件で内製と外注が逆転 — 1件単価だけで決めない\n\n\n\n",
"url": "https://design-vault.pages.dev/designs/break-even-inhouse-outsourcing/pattern.html",
"fonts": [
"https://design-vault.pages.dev/designs/break-even-inhouse-outsourcing/font.css",
"https://design-vault.pages.dev/designs/break-even-inhouse-outsourcing/font-0.woff2",
"https://design-vault.pages.dev/designs/break-even-inhouse-outsourcing/font-1.woff2",
"https://design-vault.pages.dev/designs/break-even-inhouse-outsourcing/font-2.woff2"
]
}
},
"urls": {
"ja": "https://design-vault.pages.dev/designs/break-even-inhouse-outsourcing",
"en": "https://design-vault.pages.dev/en/designs/break-even-inhouse-outsourcing"
},
"notesMarkdown": "1件あたりの単価だけを比べると、月の処理件数が少ない間に効く固定費を見落とす。ここでは\n内製に月72万円の固定費と1件400円、外注に月12万円の固定費と1件1,400円を仮定した。\n\n総費用は600件/月で一致する。それより少ない月は外注、それより多い月は内製のほうが安い。\n範囲や品質、立ち上げ費用を含めた実際の判断では、同じ条件を費用に加えて交点を引き直す。"
}